Conspiracy: Is a combination or an agreement made or initiated between two or more persons, for accomplishing an unlawful end or a lawful end by way of unlawful means. .The essence of “conspiracy: is an agreement, together with an overt act, to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act in an unlawful manner. Actors may drop out, and others may drop in; the details may change from time to time; and the members need not know each other or the part played by others; a member need not know all the details of the plan or the operations; he must, however, know the purpose of the conspiracy and agree to become a party to a plan to effectuate that purpose.
.
.jpg)
.
Further, conspiracy is a consultation or agreement between two or more persons either falsely to accuse another of a crime punishable by law; or wrongfully to injure or prejudice a third person or any body of men, in any manner; or to commit any offense punishable by law; or to do any act with intent to prevent the course of justice; or to effect a legal purpose with a corrupt intent, or by improper means.
.
.
Another example of the practiced fraud is when the officers or agents initiate and or go into the publicly—funded court rooms, using the courts to enforce “Color of Law”. They will insistently start telling you (the accused) how much you are going to pay them for the so-called listed infractions and violations. They (the judges, prosecutors and other court officers) try to roll right over you, while, in the same instance, violating the ‘due - process’ restrictions placed upon them by law. You (the accused) must be aware that they (the judges, prosecutors, policemen, etc.) are knowingly ignoring, violating, and trampling over established ‘due process’ obligations and ‘Stare Decisis’, secured for the natural People and citizens, by law. See Amendments IV, V, Vi, VII, VIII, IX, and X, etc. Don't let their corruption go on unchallenged or un-rebutted. Do not be afraid of the alleged "trial", as the transcripts (containing your proper questioning and statements) at the pseudo-trial would expose them and their criminality to others and to the Supreme Court (Original Jurisdiction).
.
Transcripts and documented records related to the process will (in future examinations) expose your lawful position, vs. their unlawful practices. These facts have been, and are, usually suppressed by them (the officers of the fraud-based courts). They do not want that information exposed to the public or to a higher court, by way of Mandamus. If you (the accused) think you are going to a legitimate trial, as the conspiring officers have implied, and threatened you with, then consider this: Pre-produce 12 copies of the documents and records for the (alleged) jury of your own national peers. Demand that you preserve your rights to participate in the selection of the jury, with your Moorish Consul present (Ministers / Grand Sheiks, etc.). They have the authoritative right to be a part of the due—process rights preserved for them to select, screen, question, and critique the alleged jury of your peers.
.
One clear and pertinent question already looms over the process—Who are the people that the officers of the court are alleging to be your peers? Are they truly Aboriginal Americans, or are these persons actually colonial imposters and foreigners posing (fraudulently) as Americans (Al Moroccans)? The plot begins to thicken, doesn’t it?! Review the laws of evidence as expressed in the legal definition of ‘Identity’.
.
Furthermore, and in the interest of universal Justice, it is important for all Moorish - Americans to know (factually) that ‘Traffic Courts’ are ‘Administrative Courts’. These private corporate courts cannot lawfully have or initiate a trial, exercising judicial powers. They are essentially kangaroo courts. It is also important to know that you (the accused) already have and possess rights to travel the public roadways and highways of the Land. If the Natural People were to all collectively exercise these rights, we wouldn’t be easily subjected to these unlawful processes.
.
There is more information and ‘Stare Decisis’ law presented on this subject. Upon further research, you will find many Supreme Court rulings preserving the Substantive Rights of the people. In regards to not utilizing the “fraud-based driving instruments” imposed upon the people, the information contained herein must be understood by the people collectively in order for them to lawfully exercise rights already belonging to them. Keep in mind (those of you who currently have those imposed instruments of converted rights) that just because you do have them in your possession, doesn’t mean or establish that you have knowingly or willingly given up or waived any of your Unalienable Rights. Always sign any instruments placed before you by agencies, or any Officers of the Corporate State of New Jersey (or any other States), with “all rights reserved”. (See "How To Live Within Contracts” on the Open Readings Page).
.
Another dirty trick, initiated by corporate thieves in seats of municipal governments is when they ask you: “Do you waive your Right to Counsel?” Do not fall for this deception. You may possibly assume that your are denying their court-appointed attorney. When in reality, if you agree to “waive your right to counsel”, you have done just that—waived your right. This is why they will not let any other person be your consul when you ‘present’ yourself “In Propria Persona”. Do not transfer or waive any rights, or give (leave) to any 'colorable' persons or entities present or not present in the 'Administrative Court'.
.
This deceptive offer, is designed to gain jurisdictional authority by oral agreement. It is a jurisdictional contract offer, given under coercion and imposed duress. Never waive your right to counsel (rightfully, Consul), and in fact, state for the record, your name and Nationality, and state that you do not, did not, and do not intend to ever waive any of your secured rights to due process.
,
The valid venue of proper jurisdiction must be secured by the Officers of the Court, upon your demand.
.
As per the Constitution, you have a pre-existing Right to Consul. Do not allow the judge or prosecutor (both being officers of the Barrister’s Association), solicit from the bench, sales and offers from that conflict of interest, private club. Do not allow these ‘colored’ persons decide who will be your consul / counsel. They are already operating in a verifiable state of “conflict of Interest”. Do not let or trust them to tell you the truth about their obligations, or to inform you that you have to have someone who is (allegedly) licensed to ‘practice’ law. The Congress does not, and the Constitution does not, license lawyers; because there is no such thing as a license to practice law. The law (Constitution) is common to every free national being. There is no political or religious test or requirement to have a ‘license’ in order to exercise, enjoy, or to command the enforcement of the law (Constitution, Bill of Rights and Treaties). Do not believe me - ask these administrative accusers to show you documented proof by Exhibit, their license to practice law. They, in turn, will not; they cannot; and they do not; because such instruments do not exist. And this is the FACT. They (the Attorneys or other Officers of the Court) may show you (under the rule of Discovery) a “Bar Association Membership Card” which they also are loath to do. However that instrument is not a license, and is far from an alleged license. Such instruments are private club—member, dues paying, agreements, which have nothing to do with Constitutional Obligations (Articles III and VI) and are merely membership cards issued by private corporate interests, and officers of the Barristers Association — a private and exclusive club.
No comments:
Post a Comment